[ale] XFS on Linux - Is it ready for prime time?

[Greg Clifton]

Any feedback on the SSD question? They are inherently more reliable (by at
least an order of magnitude), no? Read and Write Performance is going up as
well as capacities, and prices are coming down. A multi TB SSD array is
probably not something that most of us could afford to park at home just
yet, but maybe in another 2-5 yrs?

GC

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer at gmail.com>wrote:

> Jim,
>
> Linux mdraid supports 3 drive mirrors.  You should have similar write
> performance to a 2 drive mirror and improved read-performance.
>
> So if your using mdraid, you might want to consider raid 10 with 3
> drive mirrors, and maybe one hot spare for the whole array.
>
> Greg
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:
> > RAID 5 was an invention for a time when hard drives were total crap tons
> of
> > money. The pain of losing a drive in a RAID 5 array is just no longer
> > balanced by the cost of the drives. If a 1TB drive is only $100, it's
> > bluntly dirt cheap now to have a hot spare in a 4 active drive RAID 10
> > system. The recovery is much easier and faster when checksums don't have
> to
> > be calculated for every stinking block on the drive(s).
> >
> > My ideal rig: Striped array for speed composed of mirrored triplets - 2
> > active, one hot spare per active pair.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Greg Clifton <gccfof5 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Shift in focus to the hardware side of the equation. This thread
> >> concentrates on software generated corruption issues, but I have some
> >> hardware related questions. First, with RAIDed hard drives, are any file
> >> systems more or less likely to cause (or minimize) the likelihood of
> >> corruption of the array and if so, why? Second Greg F (and others) have
> >> commented on NOT using RAID 5 (and RAID 6) esp. with large hard drives.
> >> Looks like 1 or 2 TB hard drives will soon be "standard issue" for
> >> everything but notebook computers. So does that mean that RAID should be
> >> considered 'dead,' except for 0, 1, 10? Third, would SSDs solve the
> failure
> >> from bad sector issues with HDDs and thus be safe for RAID 5/6
> >> implementations?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Ed Cashin <ecashin at noserose.net>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Doug McNash <dmcnash at charter.net>
> wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> > Does anyone out there use xfs? How about a suggestion for a stable
> >>> > replacement.
> >>>
> >>> If you use the xfs in the mainline kernel, it's a crap shoot because
> >>> of the amount of churn in the code, but
> >>> if you use a long-term kernel like 2.6.16.y, 2.6.27.y, or the kernels
> >>> maintained by distros, then it ought to be stable (as long as the
> >>> distro has enough of a user base for other people to find the xfs
> >>> bugs first).
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>  Ed Cashin <ecashin at noserose.net>
> >>>  http://noserose.net/e/
> >>>  http://www.coraid.com/
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Ale mailing list
> >>> Ale at ale.org
> >>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> >>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ale mailing list
> >> Ale at ale.org
> >> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> >> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > James P. Kinney III
> > Actively in pursuit of Life, Liberty and Happiness
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Greg Freemyer
> Head of EDD Tape Extraction and Processing team
> Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer
> CNN/TruTV Aired Forensic Imaging Demo -
>
> http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/23/how-computer-evidence-gets-retrieved/
>
> The Norcross Group
> The Intersection of Evidence & Technology
> http://www.norcrossgroup.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20100422/be18379c/attachment-0001.html