[ale] rsync comparisons

[Björn Gustafsson]

Which switches are you using now?  It doesn't sound like adding the
ones discussed so far will help.

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Robert Coggins <ale at cogginsnet.com> wrote:
> Well, what I a seeing is the syncing of roughly 20GB taking over an hour
> for just a few megs of differences.  It stays in the "building file
> list..." for almost all of this time.  I am trying to find a way to
> speed that up.
>
> Rob
>
> On 04/01/2010 11:37 AM, scott wrote:
>> rsync compares on a file level BUT it compares timedate stamps/sizes
>> in "quick mode" (which is default).  but if you want it to compare
>> file to file, use "-c or --checksum" option.  Now this puts a heavier
>> load on both systems, since it does a MD5 checksum on every file that
>> has the same timedate stamp/size on both sides of the sync.  Now if
>> you want to force the copy of the whole file instead of the changed
>> blocks, use the --whole-file option with it.
>>
>> I would use this ( -c & --whole-file) sparingly.  It is going to slow
>> down the copies, put heavier loads on both ends and transfer more data
>> (control data) back and forth.  I dont know your situation so I cant
>> say to use it or or not.
>>
>> scott
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Robert Coggins <ale at cogginsnet.com> wrote:
>>> Is there a way to do file level comparisons and not block level
>>> comparisons using rsync?
>>>
>>> Rob

-- 
Björn Gustafsson