[ale] Testing Gmail + FireGPG take 2

[Tim Watts]

Whoa! A good sig on this msg Jim! It seems to be a total crap shoot as
to whether a firegpg-originated msg will show up good or bad. What's
really puzzling to me is that the SAME message shows up good for some of
us and bad for others.


On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 21:55 -0500, Jim Kinney wrote:
> wrong signature. signing back from rich text utf-8
> 
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:48 PM, <jeremy.bouse at undergrid.net> wrote:
>         This is being sent using FireGPG 0.7.10 on Firefox 3.5.5 using
>         text/plain & text/html formats
>         
>         If this GPG signature validates that sending "Rich Formating"
>         works without problem. 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> James P. Kinney III
> Actively in pursuit of Life, Liberty and Happiness         
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo


________
Force is all-conquering, but its victories are short-lived.
-- Abraham Lincoln

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20091129/6bdfccfe/attachment.bin