[ale] testing firegpg with mailman

[aaron]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2009, Nov, 29, , at 10:47 AM, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> Jim Kinney wrote:
>> OK all. Michael sent this email to the group with a valid signature
>> attached. It went through mailman and is valid as per FireGPG on my
>> fedora12/Firefox 3.5.5 system.
>>
>> Did anyone get this with a bad signature? Please indicate whether  
>> your
>> mailreader is Gmail/FireGPG, evolution, thunderbird/enigmail, mutt
>> w/gpg, etc.
>>
> 	The problem hasn't been with FireGPG being able to validate
> signatures... It's been validating signatures *sent* using FireGPG  
> that
> go through the ALE mailman instance...
>
> 	So long as the message is signed using anything *except* FireGPG
> mailman is not mangling it and the signatures are then verified.  
> Somehow
>  FireGPG is handling the issue the signatures still appear valid, I  
> can
> only suppose it's noticing the MIME content headers have been  
> reformated
> and formats them back before verifing.

Just a friendly reminder that, according to the extension program's
home page, FireGPG is BETA software.  If Jeremy's observation is
correct, sounds like we should be communicating with them about the
problems of sending FireGPG signed messages via gmail to a Mailman
list.  (-: That way they can get the kinks worked out before they
compile the versions for PPC OSeX that I need. :-)

peace
aaron





-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLEr/+AAoJECuLIj3K3aljzcAIAPX+hawCQDNv9aYOdYlte1Fm
LGsW62dak/aAAF67QP2ewMrUkYITK6/SWwf4c1S6quo8OQX/mJhtJV77Dnr40k+0
WpDuF1QStUVi1OvphjEVG2DpZ2nFcSOwcpaFLKnLzJO2fbRNFfmG+/BOqCPj2rid
qr99Zc0DTQ7TZG93hRrr5pMQQc3T99jDth3qfqQKYyzodO7ZMt+qKb367w+F6V7H
Zr59oQmFuj737k4NAg0UtocUM16gCN70p9KmrDIley7pSTQjvIm6DuDZ2wAyaQbc
HrsI2jzN03ObKsIPkE+Ww/ZeTjM3uAd9H8fRC/ir3Sr34BTHTjati6UmBulG5bw=
=xado
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----