[ale] sloppy coding in breath tester

Jeff Lightner jlightner at water.com
Fri May 15 12:22:08 EDT 2009


Funny - reminds me of the Star Trek classic faux pas by Spock.  He
raised a setting "1 to the 4th power".  Apparently 1 to the 5th would
have been overkill... :)

-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 12:00 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux!
Subject: Re: [ale] sloppy coding in breath tester

On Fri, 15 May 2009, Jim Kinney wrote:

> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:16 AM, tom <tfreeman at intel.digichem.net>
wrote:
>
>> I only scanned the link, so ...
>>
>> There is another possiblity - the authors were never CS trained at
all.
>> I'd guess that many of the people writing code for the breathalyzer
were
>> originally engineers or scientists with a dominant background in
>> instrumentation. Coding would have been pickup activity which started
>> taking over their lives like kudzu. Hence sloppy code due to a lack
of
>> background.
>>
>
> I disagree. I would suspect the bad code to be from a coder with lousy
> math/science skills not a science person with lousy code skills.
>
> There is a big difference between teh average of an array of values
> and the average of an array of values plus a new value.
>
> But without knowing details of who the bonehead was who didn't do due
> diligence verification this all just blowing smoke.

Well, we definitely agree about the blowing smoke part here.

So, as you expect, here is some more smoke...

While not directly coding, I have seen some PhD chemists do absolutely 
horrible things to a simple algebraic expression in support of their 
notions. One of those was also a major "supporter" of using statistical 
methods - like performing a regression on three variables which had the 
constraint a + b + c = 100. Einstein wondered why some of us laughed 
behind his back.

Basic ignorance isn't limited to any field of endevor. Which is sort of 
what I was trying to imply earlier on
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
 
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------



More information about the Ale mailing list