[ale] Linux in SIGINT

[Jeff Lightner]

I don't really see this as clueless.  Essentially he is saying it is
easier to hack a known standard than to hack something proprietary.
Folks might infer from the way he wrote it that Linux is somehow a
security issue but he doesn't actually say that.  It may well be his
intent to imply that but since we're not mind readers we can't really
say it is.

-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Jeff
Layton
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 1:28 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: [ale] Linux in SIGINT

Afternoon all,

Did anyone else see this article?

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htintel/articles/20090227.aspx

Seems like some writes on the web don't have a clue
(what else is new?).


Jeff


_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
 
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------