[ale] LDAP Server

[Brandon Colbert]

Man. Redhat-DS got like 500 million settings. LOL

I am going to go with redhat-ds or centos-ds

Thanks,

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Scott McBrien <smcbrien at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Apr 7, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Brandon Colbert
> <colbert.brandon at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I been tasked to setup a fail-over ldap solution at work. We have
> > one running openldap. I wanted to get everyone opinion on the
> > difference between OpenLDAP, CentOS-DS, Fedora-DS, and Redhat-DS.
> >
> > If you had your choice, which one will you use?
> >
> >
> > FYI: In the near future we will tie samba and radius with ldap.
>
> Do you want support?  Red Hat DS
> Do you want the stability of RH DS, but no support?  CentOS DS, it's
> built from the Red Hat sources like the distro.
> Do you want no support, no cost, and the latest and greatest
> improvements? Fedora DS, it's the upstream for RH DS, and therefore
> also CentOS DS.
>
> I know a guy on IRC (freenode #rhel) who is using samba + freeradius
> for a fairly sizable deployment.  If no one else gives you some
> pointers, you might ask him about it.  His nick is rigeld2.
>
> -Scott
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20090407/381152a7/attachment.html