[ale] OT: Reply to thread WAS: low-memory disros

[James Sumners]

That would make sense, and I hadn't thought of that.

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Jim Popovitch <yahoo at jimpop.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:43 PM, James Sumners <james.sumners at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > May I ask if there is something preventing you from replying to the
>  >  thread? Just about every reply from you, and a couple others on the
>  >  list, starts a new thread despite the email being in response to an
>  >  email that is a part of a thread. It looks to me like your email
>  >  client isn't including the "References" header.
>
>  Is Chris a digest subscriber?   I've noticed that in the "low-memory
>  distros"  thread, the Subject is set to "[ale] low-memory distros",
>  but Chris' post has the Subject set to "[ale]  low-memory distros"
>  (two spaces after the [ale]).   Perhaps he is a digest subscriber and
>  reformats his reply, including re-creating the Subject.
>
>  -Jim P.


-- 
James Sumners
http://james.roomfullofmirrors.com/

"All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts
pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it
is magnetic to the corruptible. Such people have a tendency to become
drunk on violence, a condition to which they are quickly addicted."

Missionaria Protectiva, Text QIV (decto)
CH:D 59