[ale] Linux job

[Christopher Fowler]

Then again time-sharing could have multiple definitions.  So you could
say UNIX and Windows are time-sharing systems.

On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:20 -0500, Rev. Johnny Healey wrote:
> I thought UNIX and Windows were considered time-sharing.  They allow
> multiple users/services to use the system at the same time, but don't
> offer the same performance guarantees that a RTOS provides.
> 
> On 3/29/06, Christopher Fowler <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com> wrote:
>         On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:35 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
>         > Classified by who?  Microsoft I'm sure.  Does anyone else
>         really 
>         > consider these to be real time implementations?
>         
>         Years ago UNIX was considered a real-time system vs what the
>         main frame
>         is.  The MF is not real-time.  More like job oriented.
>         
>         _______________________________________________ 
>         Ale mailing list
>         Ale at ale.org
>         http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale