[ale] Linux job

[Geoffrey]

Christopher Fowler wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 20:33, Geoffrey wrote:
>> Christopher Fowler wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 18:17 -0500, Vernard Martin wrote:
>>>> Understanding of real-time operating systems ie Microsoft Windows
>>>> 2000 
>>>> Advanced Server, Microsoft Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, Microsoft 
>>>> Server XP professional, Redhat Linux 2.4
>>> pseudo real-time :)
>> I was going to be good and not say it. :)
> 
> The reality is that they are classified as real-time.  Non real-time
> would be mainframe system I guess like OS/390.  And others.  In the
> context of embedded systems those operating systems are no where close
> to real-time.

Classified by who?  Microsoft I'm sure.  Does anyone else really 
consider these to be real time implementations?

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey

Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
security will deserve neither and lose both.  - Benjamin Franklin