[ale] OT: Craig Newmark of Craig's List on Net Neutrality
Jeff Hubbs
hbbs at comcast.net
Mon Jun 12 12:26:57 EDT 2006
I call "Hitler!"
Actually, I was looking forward to see what happens in Thunderbird when
the inline quote brackets on the left crash into the ones on the right.
Jeff
Chris Farris wrote:
> This thread is over
>
> Chris
>
> Geoffrey wrote:
>
>> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>>> eoffrey wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Geoffrey wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that FUD? Where do you see that this is the issue that
>>>>>>> broadband providers are concerned with?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you really think they'll stop at simply prompting you to go to
>>>>>> another site? Come on, look at television. There's not a
>>>>>> channel out there that doesn't have pop up commercials during the
>>>>>> shows now. It was bad enough when the commercials interupted
>>>>>> the shows, now they're running during them.
>>>>>>
>>>>> So, why aren't you advocating a law to restrict TV broadcasters
>>>>> from displaying pop-up ads on their content? I understand that you
>>>>> have pet-peeves (lots of them it seems ;-)), but really now,
>>>>> should everyone of your pet-peeves stimulate a new law (which, btw,
>>>>> passing new laws isn't cheap either)?
>>>>>
>>>> You know what Jim, I'm not going to get into another pissing contest
>>>> with you because you seem to enjoy that.
>>>>
>>> Oh Geoffrey stop that again, it makes you look petty. You respond to
>>> someone's comments, and when they respond back you point a finger and
>>> call it a pissing contest. Nice.
>>>
>> Petty? Who's the one dropping personal insults with their posts? Now
>> that's petty. You can't have a discussion without attacking the poster.
>> I'll be glad to have a constructive discussion about the subject, but
>> don't go insulting people and throwing words in their mouths. I never
>> once suggested a law regarding TV. If you read it that way, that's your
>> problem.
>>
>>
>>>> But, I did not once mentioned creating any laws. The original post
>>>> was about a law that was pushed through that would quote: 'allow
>>>> internet service providers to play favorites among different web
>>>>
>>> > sites.' Seems to me, I'm simply arguing against that law.
>>>
>>> You are arguing against a new law in the present case of "Net
>>> Neutrality". But your comments (that I was replying to above) about TV
>>> Pop-up ads and TV broadcasters clearly implied that if you didn't do
>>> _something_ to stop them the world could run a muck.
>>>
>> How you turn a discussion against a particular law into one promoting
>> one is beyond me. I find it interesting that you trimmed my comment as
>> to what I stated my solution to the TV problem is and that was:
>>
>> 'As for television, I simply don't watch it anymore, so the popup ad
>> folks don't get my eyes..'
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Ale
mailing list