[ale] Niece's laptop
Dow_Hurst
dhurst at mindspring.com
Mon Jul 31 15:34:53 EDT 2006
I've looked at dansguardian and it looks good to try since it will work on any Linux distro. Small and useable. I would think, Chris, that if a site you approved was hijacked, your daughter might see something that dansguardian would catch due to the phrase list checking. Together squid and dansguardian make a powerful solution. Thanks everyone! I'll test this out and then if it doesn't work out well, I'll try Linspire.
Dow
-----Original Message-----
>From: Christopher Fowler <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com>
>Sent: Jul 31, 2006 2:14 PM
>To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
>Subject: Re: [ale] Niece's laptop
>
>One idea I'm thinking about for my daughter is Squid. It does not solve
>your problem but I'm planning on using it to only allow her to visit
>sites I approve of. If she needs to go to a new site then I will add
>that to the list on the Squid server.
>
>On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 12:40 -0400, Joshua Kite wrote:
>> I've played with filtering in a number of ways. One of the better
>> solutions for MS machines is Safe Eyes. The software has to be
>> installed on every MS machine. Safe Eyes does offer an appliance
>> which is based on linux, but there is no linux version available, and
>> the appliance is cost prohibitive for home use.
>>
>> For our home I've been considering setting up a proxy through which
>> all traffic will travel using either dansguardian or censornet. I've
>> not begun working with either of them, so I can't comment on their
>> impact on performance or their effectiveness. It looks like censornet
>> follows the traditional URL filtering method while dansguardian
>> actually dynamically studies the page and determines whether to allow
>> it through based on bayesian filtering.
>>
>> Of course, both of these solutions requires setting up a proxy. I
>> don't know whether you could set either of these could be set up to
>> run on a single machine to filter it and only it. Even if that were
>> possible, her hardware might not be up to that sort of task.
>>
>> Good luck. This is a problem all of us parents will have to face for
>> a long time.
>>
>> On 7/31/06, Dow_Hurst <dhurst at mindspring.com> wrote:
>> My niece has a IBM Thinkpad 770Z that had Win98 on it. She
>> does mainly AIM messaging and watches DVDs. I think she
>> browses the web some but this is thru AOL's security enabled
>> browser that blocks most inappropriate content. The DVD
>> player stopped working and the machine would lock up alot. I
>> offered to put Linux on it and set it up for her. Right now,
>> I have SUSE 10.1 on it, DVDs will play, and firefox runs. Of
>> course it is slow, but it is useable. However, the concern is
>> the lack of any oversite on the browsing of the web. The
>> machine is pushed to the max just running 10.1 and KDE. I
>> tried XFCE but it is so plain that I am sure the more usual
>> graphical environment of KDE is what my neice will use. How
>> can I filter out bad sites as well as AOL security center
>> would? Can the machine manage that and get updated on it's
>> own somehow? Is there a service or site that does what AOL's
>> software does for protecting kids while browsing the web?
>>
>> Kopete will manage online messaging just fine. Abiword is
>> fast enough for word processing for school. Firefox is great
>> for browsing. I even had a wifi card from Edimax that will
>> work well with SUSE.
>>
>> The machine is a PII at 366MHz with 128Mb RAM. Has a small
>> 10Gb hard drive that is a bit noisy. She earned the money and
>> bought the machine herself. I hate to say to her that I can't
>> help and I need to put Win98 back on it with AOL's software
>> just to please my sister and brother-in-law. Any ideas on
>> what would be best?
>>
>> There is a Linksys wifi WRT54G router in the house she will
>> connect thru. I believe there is a service from Linksys for
>> filtering web pages available there. I'd love comments. Even
>> a new laptop as a gift would still need to have good filtering
>> of web browsing. I just can't plan on being able to manage
>> the filter list manually as I don't have that kind of time or
>> dedication!
>> Thanks,
>> Dow
>>
>>
>> No sig.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
No sig.
More information about the Ale
mailing list