[ale] Putting wifi in the house

[Greg Freemyer]

On 1/31/06, Sean Kilpatrick <drifter at oppositelock.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 12:16, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> | The FBI told me they were "too busy to concern themselves with this
> | unless there were financial damages above $10,000".
> |
> | So if a neighbor is surfing for kiddie porn on your wireless network,
> | the FBI won't do squat unless there is some serious $$ involved.
>
> That may well have been the case a few years back, say when Clinton
> was in the White House. With "W" in the WH the rules have changed. The
> FBI now seems more interested in chasing down porn peddlers and dope
> dealers than legit terrorists. They seem willing to leave _that_ task to
> the NSA. :(
>
> Sean

Actually I understand that the FBI now has anti-terrorism as its
primary focus.  porn and drugs have dropped in priority.  Obviously
the local police and GBI should still be interested.

Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century