[ale] OT easy html editor

[Geoffrey]

Christopher R. Curzio wrote:
> Personally, I prefer Nano. But the original message had a Windows slant
> to it, hence the recommendation for notepad.
> 
> Forget WYSIWYG editors altogether though. They're all a waste of time,
> and you'd be hard-pressed to find one that outputs anything resembling
> valid HTML. 
> 

bluefish, although I don't know if it's available for windows..

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey