[ale] Opinions of Arch Linux?
Scott Castaline
hscast at charter.net
Fri Aug 4 14:12:13 EDT 2006
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:18 -0500, KingBahamut wrote:
> That is the nature of some (though not all) of the debian die hards.
> Having been at the forefront of many many many Ubuntu vs Debian
> arguments where we as Ubuntu users are so flagrantly accused of not
> "giving back to debian" I understand the rationale around and behind
> "I dont like it because its not debian". But I feel not liking
> something because of this fact is a shallow representation to the
> actual functionality of the Distro -- in this case Ubuntu, for and in
> which current release has out performed any of its previous releases,
> and im sure more than one person here will aggree with me , if not I
> guess Im an island, but oh well -- or its ability to be useful.
>
> That be said, the original question what , what do you think of
> ArchLinux. I think Arch, much like any other sub level distro is more
> functional that some of its counterparts (This includes Zenwalk , only
> because im an old Slackware fan, and I have a special place in my
> heart for Slackware, even though Ubuntu is my primary distro over the
> umpteen number of machines I have in my house). Id put BLAG, Puppy,
> Kanotix, Frugalware, Nexenta (which is a really killer build of
> OpenSolaris, and I actually like it too), and Arklinux. Arch has many
> pluses to it, an independent Package manager (aptly named Pacman ,
> where is Midway to scoop up rights on that name or something , I
> swear) and its fresh look and feel. So open up a Xen, Qemu, VMware,
> OpenVZ window and install it and tell us what you think Mr. Sumners.
> Id be anxious to hear your experiences.
>
> On 8/4/06, James Sumners <james.sumners at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure you are joking. But, no, I haven't considered
> it
> because I know I don't like it.
>
> On 8/4/06, Geoffrey <esoteric at 3times25.net> wrote:
> > James Sumners wrote:
> > > I have stated my opinion of Ubuntu. I would appreciate it
> if people
> > > will now stop trying to convince me it is some sort of
> Holy Grail.
> > > I've been using Debian since the Slink (2.1) release. I
> think I can
> > > tell the difference between Debian and a Debian
> derivative; and
> > > develop a fair opinion of them.
> >
> > But have you considered Ubuntu?
> >
> > --
> > Until later, Geoffrey
> >
> > Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a
> little
> > security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin
> Franklin
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >
>
>
> --
> James Sumners
> http://james.roomfullofmirrors.com/
>
> "All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts
> pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but
> that it
> is magnetic to the corruptible. Such people have a tendency to
> become
> drunk on violence, a condition to which they are quickly
> addicted."
>
> Missionaria Protectiva, Text QIV (decto)
> CH:D 59
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>
>
> --
> KingBahamut
> http://doc.gwos.org - Definitive Ubuntu Documentation
> "I could tell you the probability, but you wouldnt like it."
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
I agree, finding the perfect disro or sub-distro is like searching for
that all allusive perfect pint of beer. To me that's the beauty of the
Linux world, I call it choice, something not offered in one world in
particular. Not mentioning any names for fear of copyright &/or patent
infringements, but a hint would be M$.
--
Scott Castaline aka Bad2theBone
Hey! I was born crazy, what's your excuse?
More information about the Ale
mailing list