[ale] [Mailer-Daemon at rdlg.net: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]
Robert L. Harris
Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net
Sun Nov 13 09:11:01 EST 2005
As I said. I'm on a dynamic IP, my cablemodem. The majority of spam I
get at home and corporate are not from cablemodems, they're from ISP
level accounts. Spammers who set up with an account, spam the hell out
of it until the ISP recevies enough complaints to get thsm shut off then
they move to the next ISP. I work at an ISP and deal with this daily.
Thus spake H. A. Story (adrin at bellsouth.net):
> It maybe because rdlg.net is can not be reversed. Lookup up rdlg.net
> gives a IP. but then looking up the ip returns a charter IP
> ###.###.###.###.dhcp.stbr.ga.charter.com.
>
> Just another step in trying to control SPAM. didn't I read that one
> ISP in AU was going to start notify their customers that they may have a
> bot machine on their LAN?
>
> Adrin
>
>
> Robert L. Harris wrote:
>
> >Mindspring/Earthlink sucks. I'm on a cablemodem, I must be a spammer. I
> >tried getting them to remove my IP from this crap but they just ignore the
> >emails it seems
> >
> >
> >----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon at rdlg.net> -----
> >
> >From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon at rdlg.net>
> >To: nomad at rdlg.net
> >Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
> >Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:39 -0500
> >Message-Id: <E1EacEZ-0008Uq-Tx at wally.rdlg.net>
> >X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 97.1123 )
> >
> >This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> >
> >A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> >recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> >
> > Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com
> > SMTP error from remote mail server after MAIL FROM:<nomad at rdlg.net> SIZE=3494:
> > host mx04.mindspring.com [207.69.200.93]: 550 Dynamic IPs/open relays blocked. Contact <openrelay at abuse.earthlink.net>.
> >
> >------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
> >
> >Return-path: <nomad at rdlg.net>
> >Received: from nomad by wally.rdlg.net with local (Exim 4.54)
> > id 1EacEW-0008Um-Fc; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:36 -0500
> >Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:36 -0500
> >From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net>
> >To: Dow_Hurst <Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com>,
> > Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
> >Subject: Re: [ale] RAID recovery speed
> >Message-ID: <20051111165836.GW4883 at rdlg.net>
> >References: <23073622.1131728185083.JavaMail.root at mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F74xYepWx8quU230"
> >Content-Disposition: inline
> >In-Reply-To: <23073622.1131728185083.JavaMail.root at mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
> >
> >
> >--F74xYepWx8quU230
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Disposition: inline
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> >
> >
> >I do that regularly. Kick up both the Min and Max. If the system is
> >under heavey load though it may take a while. The system won't penalize
> >the apps over a raid rebuild.
> >
> >Robert
> >
> >Thus spake Dow_Hurst (dhurst at mindspring.com):
> >
> >
> >
> >>May I "echo 2048 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min" to speed up the re=
> >>
> >>
> >build of a disk that was kicked out of a RAID5 array? The rebuild is runni=
> >ng at 1032K/sec and is at 88%. That has taken 1.5 days minimum to get this=
> > far. I was looking around using Google for the answer and never found any=
> >thing on doing this during a rebuild.
> >
> >
> >>Thanks,
> >>Dow
> >>=20
> >>=20
> >>No sig.
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Ale mailing list
> >>Ale at ale.org
> >>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >>
> >>
> >
> >:wq!
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
> >
> >DISCLAIMER:
> > These are MY OPINIONS "We can't solve problems by using
> > ALONE. I speak for the same kind of thinking we used
> > no-one else. when we created them."
> > - Einstein
> >
> >
> >--F74xYepWx8quU230
> >Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
> >Content-Description: Digital signature
> >Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> >iD8DBQFDdM288+1vMONE2jsRAnMaAKCjNVY8KAm7bT1XxqcW1hRq5GcFPwCdGZvT
> >RoxwQtTGLq/EHrkiYeEyJw0=
> >=B5U8
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >--F74xYepWx8quU230--
> >
> >----- End forwarded message -----
> >
> >:wq!
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
> >
> >DISCLAIMER:
> > These are MY OPINIONS "We can't solve problems by using
> > ALONE. I speak for the same kind of thinking we used
> > no-one else. when we created them."
> > - Einstein
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ale mailing list
> >Ale at ale.org
> >http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS "We can't solve problems by using
ALONE. I speak for the same kind of thinking we used
no-one else. when we created them."
- Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Ale
mailing list