[ale] [Mailer-Daemon at rdlg.net: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]
Robert L. Harris
Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net
Fri Nov 11 11:59:58 EST 2005
Mindspring/Earthlink sucks. I'm on a cablemodem, I must be a spammer. I
tried getting them to remove my IP from this crap but they just ignore the
emails it seems
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon at rdlg.net> -----
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon at rdlg.net>
To: ale at ale.org
To: nomad at rdlg.net
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:39 -0500
Message-Id: <E1EacEZ-0008Uq-Tx at wally.rdlg.net>
X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 97.1123 )
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com
SMTP error from remote mail server after MAIL FROM:<nomad at rdlg.net> SIZE=3494:
host mx04.mindspring.com [207.69.200.93]: 550 Dynamic IPs/open relays blocked. Contact <openrelay at abuse.earthlink.net>.
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <nomad at rdlg.net>
Received: from nomad by wally.rdlg.net with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EacEW-0008Um-Fc; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:36 -0500
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:58:36 -0500
From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net>
To: ale at ale.org
To: Dow_Hurst <Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com>,
Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
Subject: Re: [ale] RAID recovery speed
Message-ID: <20051111165836.GW4883 at rdlg.net>
References: <23073622.1131728185083.JavaMail.root at mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F74xYepWx8quU230"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <23073622.1131728185083.JavaMail.root at mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
--F74xYepWx8quU230
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I do that regularly. Kick up both the Min and Max. If the system is
under heavey load though it may take a while. The system won't penalize
the apps over a raid rebuild.
Robert
Thus spake Dow_Hurst (dhurst at mindspring.com):
> May I "echo 2048 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min" to speed up the re=
build of a disk that was kicked out of a RAID5 array? The rebuild is runni=
ng at 1032K/sec and is at 88%. That has taken 1.5 days minimum to get this=
far. I was looking around using Google for the answer and never found any=
thing on doing this during a rebuild.
> Thanks,
> Dow
> =20
>=20
> No sig.
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS "We can't solve problems by using
ALONE. I speak for the same kind of thinking we used
no-one else. when we created them."
- Einstein
--F74xYepWx8quU230
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDdM288+1vMONE2jsRAnMaAKCjNVY8KAm7bT1XxqcW1hRq5GcFPwCdGZvT
RoxwQtTGLq/EHrkiYeEyJw0=
=B5U8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--F74xYepWx8quU230--
----- End forwarded message -----
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS "We can't solve problems by using
ALONE. I speak for the same kind of thinking we used
no-one else. when we created them."
- Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Ale
mailing list