[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?
George Carless
kafka at antichri.st
Sun Jul 3 11:23:31 EDT 2005
It sounds to me as though you're describing a proxy - for which
purpose anything like Squid etc. would do the trick just fine.
--George
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 08:47:18AM -0400, David Corbin wrote:
> I'm only looking at bit torrent for the first time, so perhaps I'm way out of
> bounds. It seems to me there would be some value in having a two part client
> for those of us behind a NAT. Specifically, I'm thinking that there could be
> a server component on, or just outside the NATter. It would be the true
> client of the bit torrent protocol, and would be a daemon. Then, people
> inside the NAT could run clients that would talk to this server component.
>
> I believe, this would avoid the need to punch a whole in my firewall to get
> maximal throughput and follow good netiquette. One could even make the
> server component "stay connected" longer than the actual user, if necessary
> to fulfill "good behavior".
>
> Is there such a thing? Is this reasonable?
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
--
--------------------------------------
George Carless ... kafka at antichri.st
Words are just dust in deserts of sound
More information about the Ale
mailing list