[ale] Distro Reply

[Jonathan Rickman]

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:41:21 -0500, Jim Popovitch <jimpop at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Stable Debian's focus is stability, not freshness. (NOTE: Debian was
> doing this long before RHEL started doing the same)

So if we demand the ultimate in stability on windows systems, should
we all run NT4?

old != stable 

Personally, I find the 2.4 series to be significantly more stable than
the 2.2 series in just about every conceivable situation. Last time I
checked, RHEL was up to 2.4.9, so I'm afraid I don't understand that
comparison.

--
Jonathan