[ale] new Box crashes when nmapped
Kofi Boateng
kboateng_cs at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 19 08:22:44 EDT 2005
I tried your command line option and it did not find any host on my network. But when you change the -PT to -sT, it will find the host. Give that a try.
ale-request at ale.org wrote:Send Ale mailing list submissions to
ale at ale.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ale-request at ale.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
ale-owner at ale.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ale digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Strangenes (Vernard Martin)
2. Problems with NTP? (Chuck Huber)
3. Re: Yet another regex question (Joe Knapka)
4. new box crashes when nmapped (Jim Popovitch)
5. Re: Vonage redux (Randal Jarrett (K4RSJ))
6. Re: Vonage redux (Christopher Bergeron)
7. Re: Vonage redux (Jason Fritcher)
8. DELIVERY REPORTS ABOUT YOUR E-MAIL (dchambers at bugfixer.net)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:58:49 -0400
From: Vernard Martin
Subject: Re: [ale] Strangenes
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Message-ID: <4304DA69.5070607 at venger.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
tfreeman at intel.digichem.net wrote:
>You _do_ have the -devel packages installed don't you? 8-)
>
>I've noticed that Fedora doesn't always install all the devel packages
>that I would expect it to. Memory says that the GTK is one, but I could
>be mistaken.
>
>
Aha! I had gtk2-devel installed but I needed gtk+-devel installed as
well. Subtle but very important.
Thanks.
Vernard
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:03:06 -0400
From: Chuck Huber
Subject: [ale] Problems with NTP?
To: ale at ale.org
Message-ID: <4304DB6A.4090205 at cehuber.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Has anyone heard of problems with NTP flooding a server? I received a
call from the USNO stating that my system was flooding them with NTP
requests at a rate of over 70 per second. I shut ntp down for the time
being until I can figure out the cause.
I'm running 4.1.2 on Fedora. No updates available from RH.
Thanks,
- Chuck
--
"The purpose of encryption is to protect good people
from bad people, not to protect bad people from the government."
-- Scott McNealy, CEO Sun Microsystems
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time
with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
-- Thomas Jefferson
"If there must be trouble let it be in my day,
that my child may have peace."
-- Thomas Paine
"The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution,
are worth defending against all hazards: And it is our duty to
defend them against all attacks."
-- Samuel Adams
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: 18 Aug 2005 14:40:35 -0600
From: Joe Knapka
Subject: Re: [ale] Yet another regex question
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Cc: jknapka at kneuro.net
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Jason Day writes:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 05:53:16AM -0400, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 02:48 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> [snip]
> > > So, a regmatch of "[^ ]XMI001" would match "XMI001" and "zXMI001" but
> > > not " XMI001" since the brackets contain a negated space (i.e. no space
> > > before XMI001)
> >
> > I think the problem with that is that it requires something to be before
> > the X. Something has to be there but no space. I'm using perl to test
> > the ideas.
>
> Try "[^ ]?XMI001". That should match the string "XMI001" optionally
> preceded by any character that is not a space. If you want to match 0
> or more non-spaces, use "[^ ]*XMI001".
But the string " XMI001" *is* an instance of "XMI001" preceded by
zero non-space characters (and those zero non-spaces are preceded
by some spaces), so would match both of your expressions.
This definitely requires negative lookbehind, or else a multi-step
filter (get the lines containing "XMI001", then discard the ones
containing " XMI001"). "grep XMI001 [file] | grep -v ' XMI001'"
should do it. Except I think Chris said that the input is NOT
line-oriented, which means that no line-oriented filter is going
to be able to do the right thing.
-- Joe Knapka
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:38:02 -0400
From: Jim Popovitch
Subject: [ale] new box crashes when nmapped
To: ALE
Message-ID: <1124397482.3085.2.camel at localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain
I've got a new RH ES 3 box setup (pretty much default settings) and when
I nmap it from a second host it freezes and needs to be cold booted.
Here's what I am doing:
nmap -PT -p 1- 192.168.3.6
I can't imagine that this is normal or expected behavior. Any ideas on
what could be happening?
Tia,
-Jim P.
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:47:32 -0400
From: "Randal Jarrett (K4RSJ)"
Subject: Re: [ale] Vonage redux
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Message-ID: <1124398052.8882.9.camel at k4rsj.radio.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
One thing that I have heard second hand it that if you buy
a box such as the Linksys to use with Vontage and later
decide to cancel, you either have to return the box to
Vontage or pay a $50 fee.
Just something to be aware of!
Randy
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 09:42 -0400, Mills, John M. wrote:
> ALErs -
>
> I have a fairly simple home [sub]net with a static IP, a very simple Airlink
> wired/wireless router, and two users: one hard-wired, one wireless (minimal
> WEP encryption and known MAC for link security). I am considering a Vonage
> subscription, plugged into the router by wired link and just "doing its own
> thing" with Vonage's servers.
>
> The router now passes all outgoing and response packets, but does not
> currently forward any ports to specific LAN IPs.
>
> I scanned the recent 'Vonage' thread and it seems to suggest this will work
> if I simply plug the Vonage modem into any available enternet slot in the
> LAN, but answers to a couple of questions would raise my confidence:
>
> Q1: Does Vonage service require any inbound ports be forwarded to its modem,
> or does the modem initiate the connection and get only repies, even for
> inbound phone calls? Vonage' installation notes list a potload of ports
> which shouldn't be blocked, but don't say if any must be specifically
> forwarded to their modem.
>
> Q2: Does Vonage typically provide the modem, or do most customers go buy one
> (LinkSys or whatever) from a third party? Any strong preferences? (I know I
> could replace the simple Airlink router with a "known brand" - is this
> useful?)
>
> Q3: If Vonage service requires inbound port forwarding, do they provide a
> modem that can use a fixed IP in my LAN?
>
> Q4: Vonage' notes suggest that putting their interface behind the modem does
> sacrifice some functionality (e.g., QoS control), but that it should work.
> What should I anticipate happening to the phone link when another system is
> keeping the LAN busy?
>
> Thanks for any experience you could share and suggestions you might offer.
>
> - John Mills
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
--
Randy Jarrett K4RSJ
Randy's Ham Shack
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:30:38 -0400
From: Christopher Bergeron
Subject: Re: [ale] Vonage redux
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Cc: "J. M. Mills \(john.m.mills at alum.mit.edu\)"
Message-ID: <4305363E.3090506 at bergeron.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
John, I think Vonage uses standard VOIP phones. If so, they just use
the SIP protocol ports (5566, etc I think). I just recently set up an IP
phone here at home from my office. They're pretty slick devices.
Kind regards,
Chris Bergeron
Dashwerks, Inc.
Mills, John M. wrote:
>ALErs -
>
>I have a fairly simple home [sub]net with a static IP, a very simple Airlink
>wired/wireless router, and two users: one hard-wired, one wireless (minimal
>WEP encryption and known MAC for link security). I am considering a Vonage
>subscription, plugged into the router by wired link and just "doing its own
>thing" with Vonage's servers.
>
>The router now passes all outgoing and response packets, but does not
>currently forward any ports to specific LAN IPs.
>
>I scanned the recent 'Vonage' thread and it seems to suggest this will work
>if I simply plug the Vonage modem into any available enternet slot in the
>LAN, but answers to a couple of questions would raise my confidence:
>
>Q1: Does Vonage service require any inbound ports be forwarded to its modem,
>or does the modem initiate the connection and get only repies, even for
>inbound phone calls? Vonage' installation notes list a potload of ports
>which shouldn't be blocked, but don't say if any must be specifically
>forwarded to their modem.
>
>Q2: Does Vonage typically provide the modem, or do most customers go buy one
>(LinkSys or whatever) from a third party? Any strong preferences? (I know I
>could replace the simple Airlink router with a "known brand" - is this
>useful?)
>
>Q3: If Vonage service requires inbound port forwarding, do they provide a
>modem that can use a fixed IP in my LAN?
>
>Q4: Vonage' notes suggest that putting their interface behind the modem does
>sacrifice some functionality (e.g., QoS control), but that it should work.
>What should I anticipate happening to the phone link when another system is
>keeping the LAN busy?
>
>Thanks for any experience you could share and suggestions you might offer.
>
> - John Mills
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:27:51 -0400
From: Jason Fritcher
Subject: Re: [ale] Vonage redux
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Message-ID: <430543A7.9040705 at wolfnet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Mills, John M. wrote:
> I read the manual and still have a question regarding port forwarding:
> LinkSys's manual says forward port 53 (DNS) to the Vonage adapter. How can
> this work? Don't the other boxen on that router need to reach DNS? Why is
> there incoming DNS anyway???
You don't need to forward DNS to the ATA. I think they suggest that to
make sure that DNS is available to the ATA. Only ports that need to
forwarded from the outside of your network to the ATA is UDP 5060 and 5061.
--
Jason Fritcher
jkf at wolfnet.org
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:04:58 +0700
From: dchambers at bugfixer.net
To: ale at ale.org
Subject: [ale] DELIVERY REPORTS ABOUT YOUR E-MAIL
To: ale at ale.org
Message-ID: <20050819070006.68E4B709D0 at ike2.room17.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The original message was received at Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:04:58 +0700
from bugfixer.net [175.86.181.20]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
ale at ale.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: text.zip
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 28978 bytes
Desc: not available
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
End of Ale Digest, Vol 56, Issue 17
***********************************
Sincerely,
Kofi Boateng
Applications Developer
Securiant Inc
6190 Powers Ferry Road Suite 290
Atlanta, Ga 30339
http://www.securiant.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ale
mailing list