[ale] MTU's and DSL's

James P. Kinney III jkinney at localnetsolutions.com
Wed Apr 20 16:54:45 EDT 2005


On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 14:51 -0400, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> This has _GOT_ to be a hardware issue with either the DSL "modem" or the
> upstream router. The packet show DF is set. It's not a PPPoE
> configuration. 

Argh! It was an id10T error. During prior testing a eth(x) was set to an
MTU 768. That had locked all of the vlans down at 768.

(slinks off to consider a new career in bartending...)

-- 
James P. Kinney III          \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \          one Linux user         /
Local Net Solutions,LLC        \           at a time.          /
770-493-8244                    \.___________________________./
http://www.localnetsolutions.com

GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part




More information about the Ale mailing list