[ale] palm41.dll weirdness
Robert Reese
ale at sixit.com
Wed Sep 22 00:28:17 EDT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 9/19/2004 at 7:56 AM Geoffrey wrote:
>>>And you determined this how? Certainly not by the name alone..
>> Not /entirely/...
>How else?
Simple, really. I run Windows and own(ed) a Palm Pilot. This isn't the
first time I've encountered this DLL (Dynamic Link Library). ;c)
>>>>Anyway, the file itself is pretty harmless, even on a windows machine.
>>>As long as it REALLY is what you THINK it is.
>> Well, he DID run strings, didn't he?
>True, but I'm pretty sure your post was before he posted the output to
>strings... :)
Actually, I don't remember. I think I was formulating a response when the
strings reply came back. Anyway, it doesn't matter much and here's why:
Dynamic Link Libraries don't belong on Linux boxes, right? So they
obviously aren't self-executable by reckoning of the operating system. Nor
are they self-executable on Windows machines; in fact, most are just
'chunks of code' that are called into play / memory only when needed, which
is their purpose and in concept a sound idea. Further, if you were to
write a virus for *nix machines, would you use a naming convention that
followed the Windows file extension of .dll? Nor likely would any *nix
virus writer I would think. ;c)
TTFN,
Robert~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
Comment: No one has the right to NOT be offended!
iQA/AwUBQU5bObw8BOWncaQMEQIlDgCgvhd5slC+a5BTSUKQi3JFKH9l98sAn366
1+GhGcOWjnNPrGDimA66wZ4K
=wvCe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Type: DH/DSS 4096/1024 AES-256
Key ID: 0xA771A40C
Fingerprint: CAE2 81CA A7CD 6681 341C E3A9 BC3C 04E5 A771 A40C
More information about the Ale
mailing list