[ale] OT: Can MS IE Really Be This Broken?
James P. Kinney III
jkinney at localnetsolutions.com
Mon Sep 20 20:50:17 EDT 2004
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 20:32, Jeff Hubbs wrote:
> I want them to appear one under the other, with the second one kicked
> out to the right a little but (note the bold headings over the tables -
> one says SR1 and the other says SR1.1, indicating a hierarchy).
embed the tables as part of a ordered list element.
>
> - Jeff
>
> On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 12:55, David Corbin wrote:
> > It displays to the right for me on FireFox, if the window is wide
> > enough. How is it you want them to display. If it's one after another,
> > you might just need a <BR> between them.
> >
> >
> > Jeff Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > >I've attached a small bit of HTML that is a mock-up of the output of a
> > >utility I'm trying to write. I'm not at all a Web developer, but I
> > >cribbed the HTML from one or more HTML guides I Googled.
> > >
> > >In Mozilla and in Konqueror, the two tables display exactly as I
> > >intended and expected. However, in IE, the second table appears to the
> > >RIGHT of the first table, which seems to run counter to everything I
> > >thought I understood about HTML table formatting.
> > >
> > >Unfortunately, the primary audience of the HTML generated by my utility
> > >will be using IE by force (in other words, any invective I might
> > >generate about the use of standards-abhorrent Web browsers will fall on
> > >deaf ears). So, does anyone have any idea how I can kluge this up so it
> > >will render in IE more or less the way it renders elsewhere?
> > >
> > >- Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > *SR1*
> > > Requirement text The system shall provide Web-based pro-active
> > > notification for the inspectors of a new task that they are to perform
> > > Name
> > > Source Gorny Email 2003/6/18
> > > Revised Yes
> > > Implementation No
> > > Feature Registration, Transfer, Import Permit, Inspection,
> > > Biosecurity Template
> > > Phase One
> > > Priority Should
> > > Status Proposed
> > > Cost
> > > Difficulty Medium
> > > Stability Medium
> > > Assigned To
> > > EnhancementRequest
> > > Defect CDC00000002
> > > Location Database
> > > Unique ID 52
> > > Package Software Requirements
> > > Author bautistas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *SR1.1*
> > > Requirement text The system shall provide functionality to allow
> > > an inspector to retrieve/view tasks assigned.
> > > Name
> > > Source JAD Interview 2003/6/16
> > > Revised No
> > > Implementation No
> > > Feature Registration, Transfer, Inspection
> > > Phase One
> > > Priority Should
> > > Status Proposed
> > > Cost
> > > Difficulty Medium
> > > Stability Medium
> > > Assigned To
> > > EnhancementRequest
> > > Defect
> > > Location Database
> > > Unique ID 53
> > > Package Software Requirements
> > > Author beresfordm
> > >
> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Ale mailing list
> > >Ale at ale.org
> > >http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
> !DSPAM:414f76dc228951255618196!
--
James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \ one Linux user /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
770-493-8244 \.___________________________./
http://www.localnetsolutions.com
GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Ale
mailing list