[ale] ed

[James P. Kinney III]

On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 09:35 -0400, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> 
> Yeah, line 3 was the one that always pissed me off.


BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! (It's not _REALLY_ funny unless it's been a very long
time since _you_ did it :)
> 
> Thus spake Charles Shapiro (charles.shapiro at nubridges.com):
> 
> > And of course you would've  had to retype your example to make it
> > workee..
> > 
> > -- CHS
> > 
> > On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 19:43, Geoffrey wrote:
> > > Robert L. Harris wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, but back in the day it was better than:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > echo "Line 1" > script
> > > > echo "Line 2" >> script
> > > > echo "Line 3" > script
> > > > 
> > > > etc which I had to do some times.
> > > 
> > > Oh yeah.  I and can recall using ed in scripts with here docs to modify 
> > > files.  I actually wrote a rudimentary editor that used 'ed.'  Upon 
> > > request as it was completely stupid.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> :wq!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
>                                          @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
> DISCLAIMER:
>       These are MY OPINIONS             With Dreams To Be A King,
>        ALONE.  I speak for              First One Should Be A Man
>        no-one else.                       - Manowar
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> !DSPAM:416bdfe6210732478847975!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part