[ale] OT: One-time use digital cameras
cfowler at outpostsentinel.com
Sun Feb 15 22:33:49 EST 2004
I've been satisfied with 8x10's coming from a 2.0MP camera. I really
can't tell if the 8x10 looks bad. Seems fine to me. My only want for
high MP's are for keeping these photos forever. I want to make sure
they are of the best quality possible.
On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 21:44, Kevin Krumwiede wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:42:24 -0500
> "Dan Lambert" <danlambert at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > Right now, I'm thinking about the Sony DSC-F828. I need an SLR, and
> > the 8 mpxl is the picture quality I'm after.
> I haven't had a chance to play with the F828. I work in a relatively
> small Ritz store and we don't keep everything in stock. In general, my
> advice is to get only as much camera as you *need* *right now*. There
> will always be something better right around the corner, and you pay a
> high price for the latest and greatest when it may be only marginally
> better. If you came into my store, the first thing I'd try to figure
> out is why you think you need an 8MP SLR. (Because some people think
> they need that much to get a decent 8x10... I blame the advertisers.)
> That said, I think the F828 is an amazing camera for the price. Even if
> you don't really need 8MP, the lens alone is worth it. For various
> reasons (engineering difficulties, weight, price...) they simply don't
> make lenses with that kind zoom and aperture range for traditional SLRs.
> It's possible on a digital in part because of the smaller size of the
> image sensor. About the closest film equivalent would be a 70-200
> f/2.8, and those can easily cost you well over $1000 for the lens alone.
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
More information about the Ale