[ale] Windows Invasion

[Ryan Matteson]

That data is pretty cool, but I am not sure how acurate it is. For 
example, It claims
Checkpoint is running Solaris 2.5 - 2.5.1. A quick check  shows that 
Checkpoint is
running Netscape enterprise 4.1, which will not run (nor is it 
supported) on 2.5.X. 
Which OS fingerprint tool was used to gather this data?

Thanks for posting the info! Good stuff!!
- Ryan

Emil P. Man wrote:

> ALErs,
> Check out these web servers! IIS is kickin' but, eh?
>
> www.l0pht.com <http://www.l0pht.com/>        => OpenBSD 2.2 - 2.4
> www.insecure.org <http://www.insecure.org/>     => Linux 2.0.31-34
> www.rhino9.ml.org <http://www.rhino9.ml.org/>    => Windows 95/NT     
> # No comment :)
> www.technotronic.com <http://www.technotronic.com/> => Linux 2.0.31-34
> www.nmrc.org <http://www.nmrc.org/>         => FreeBSD 2.2.6 - 3.0
> www.cultdeadcow.com <http://www.cultdeadcow.com/>  => OpenBSD 2.2 - 2.4
> www.kevinmitnick.com <http://www.kevinmitnick.com/> => Linux 
> 2.0.31-34  # Free Kevin!
> www.2600.com <http://www.2600.com/>         => FreeBSD 2.2.6 - 3.0 Beta
> www.antionline.com <http://www.antionline.com/>   => FreeBSD 2.2.6 - 
> 3.0 Beta
> www.rootshell.com <http://www.rootshell.com/>    => Linux 2.0.35  # 
> Changed to OpenBSD after
>                                      # they got owned.
>
> # Security vendors, consultants, etc.
> www.repsec.com <http://www.repsec.com/>       => Linux 2.0.35
> www.iss.net <http://www.iss.net/>          => Linux 2.0.31-34
> www.checkpoint.com <http://www.checkpoint.com/>   => Solaris 2.5 - 2.51
> www.infowar.com <http://www.infowar.com/>      => Win95/NT
>
> # Vendor loyalty to their OS
> www.li.org <http://www.li.org/>           => Linux 2.0.35 # Linux 
> International
> www.redhat.com <http://www.redhat.com/>       => Linux 2.0.31-34 # I 
> wonder what distribution :)
> www.debian.org <http://www.debian.org/>       => Linux 2.0.35
> www.linux.org <http://www.linux.org/>        => Linux 2.1.122 - 2.1.126
> www.sgi.com <http://www.sgi.com/>          => IRIX 6.2 - 6.4
> www.netbsd.org <http://www.netbsd.org/>       => NetBSD 1.3X
> www.openbsd.org <http://www.openbsd.org/>      => Solaris 2.6     # 
> Ahem :) (its because UAlberta                                        # 
> is hosting them)
> www.freebsd.org <http://www.freebsd.org/>      => FreeBSD 2.2.6-3.0 Beta
>
> # Ivy league
> www.harvard.edu <http://www.harvard.edu/>      => Solaris 2.6
> www.yale.edu <http://www.yale.edu/>         => Solaris 2.5 - 2.51
> www.caltech.edu <http://www.caltech.edu/>      => SunOS 4.1.2-4.1.4  # 
> Hello! This is the 90's :)   www.stanford.edu 
> <http://www.stanford.edu/>     => Solaris 2.6
> www.mit.edu <http://www.mit.edu/>          => Solaris 2.5 - 2.51 # 
> Coincidence that so many good
>                                           # schools seem to like Sun?
>                                           # Perhaps it is the 40%
>                                           # .edu discount :)
> www.berkeley.edu <http://www.berkeley.edu/>     => UNIX OSF1 V 
> 4.0,4.0B,4.0D  www.oxford.edu <http://www.oxford.edu/>       => Linux 
> 2.0.33-34  # Rock on!
>
> # Lamer sites
> www.aol.com <http://www.aol.com/>          => IRIX 6.2 - 6.4  # No 
> wonder they are so insecure :)
> www.happyhacker.org <http://www.happyhacker.org/>  => OpenBSD 2.2-2.4 
> # Sick of being owned, Carolyn?
>                                        # Even the most secure OS is
>                                        # useless in the hands of an
>                                        # incompetent admin.
>
> # Misc
> www.lwn.net <http://www.lwn.net/>          => Linux 2.0.31-34 # This 
> Linux news site rocks!
> www.slashdot.org <http://www.slashdot.org/>     => Linux 2.1.122 - 
> 2.1.126
> www.whitehouse.gov <http://www.whitehouse.gov/>   => IRIX 5.3
> sunsite.unc.edu      => Solaris 2.6
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale