[ale] Questions on Debian public server security
kaboom at gatech.edu
Thu Feb 12 09:02:11 EST 2004
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, miguel wrote:
> i think OpenBSD is more secure simply because it is developed at a
> slower pace than Debian, so chances are that out-of-the-box it will be
> more stable(== secure?)
This has to be the first time anyone's ever accused anything of slower
development than Debian ;-)
It's also wrong -- OpenBSD is released twice a year, May 1 and Nov 1.
Debian's on a multi-year release cycle.
More information about the Ale