[ale] Questions on Debian public server security

Chris Ricker kaboom at gatech.edu
Thu Feb 12 09:02:11 EST 2004

On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, miguel wrote:

> i think OpenBSD is more secure simply because it is developed at a
> slower pace than Debian, so chances are that out-of-the-box it will be
> more stable(== secure?)

This has to be the first time anyone's ever accused anything of slower 
development than Debian ;-)

It's also wrong -- OpenBSD is released twice a year, May 1 and Nov 1. 
Debian's on a multi-year release cycle.


More information about the Ale mailing list