[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?

[James Sumners]

Thanks for the input. I have IPCop running in a virtual environment right now to
test it out. So far I really dig it.

James Sumners

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:54:05 -0500
James Sumners <james at sumners.ath.cx> wrote:

> I am considering replacing a Linksys WRT54G with a Linux box. The Linksys is
> working fine but it doesn't quite cut it. My question to you is, would you
> recommend Smoothwall 2.0 over IPCop 1.3.0 or vice versa? I don't really want
> to sit down and write my own firewall scripts and web front end when there is
> already a solution.
> 
> I know that IPCop is a fork of Smoothwall but it forked a long time ago. I
> will be playing with both of them in a virtual environment but it may be some
> time before I get that set up and I would like to know if someone already has
> an opinion of one over the other (e.g. this one does this where that one
> doesn't type stuff).
> 
> -- 
> 
> I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
> looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
> technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making
> money than it is at making good operating systems.  -- Linus Torvalds
> 


-- 

I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money
than it is at making good operating systems.  -- Linus Torvalds 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available