[ale] Diebold may face criminal charges
aaron
aaron at pd.org
Tue Apr 27 09:04:40 EDT 2004
On Tuesday 27 April 2004 01:26, Bjorn Dittmer-Roche wrote:
> http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,63191,00.html?tw=wn_story_top5
>
> bjorn
The real kicker here is that the criminal charges stem from Diebold knowingly
installing uncertified, untested software on their systems prior to running
an election on them. This criminal action is identical to what they did with
every Diebold touch screen system in the entire State of Georgia for our
November, 2002 general election.
While everyone here knows that any certification and testing process for these
systems is mostly meaningless, especially without the requisite of Open
Source software, certification is still a requirement under the laws that
allow these paperless systems to be used, and the testing might even catch a
few of the most blatant abuses. Apparently, though, certification is only
important to our Secretary of State Cathy Cox when she can deceptively use it
as a blockade to auditable systems, because the entire 2002 Georgia election
was run on uncertified software.
Just the facts.
peace
aaron
More information about the Ale
mailing list