[ale] QoS Question

[Christopher Fowler]

Do I need to run cbq.init before or after my NAT rules?  I'm not seeing
any change and my cbq files look like this:

[root at firewall cbq]# cat cbq-0002         
DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit
RATE=7000bps
WEIGHT=700bps
PRIO=5
RULE=192.168.1.6
[root at firewall cbq]# cat cbq-0003
DEVICE=eth1,10Mbit,1Mbit
RATE=7000bps
WEIGHT=70bps
PRIO=5
RULE=192.168.1.6,
[root at firewall cbq]# 

I put the numbers real low so I can see from the outside if there was
some throttling going on.

I'm using kernel 2.4.25

Here is status output:
[root at firewall cbq]# cbq.init stats 
### eth0: queueing disciplines

qdisc cbq 1: rate 10Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit
 Sent 1967746 bytes 21306 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) 
  borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 624 undertime 0

 
### eth0: traffic classes

class cbq 1: root rate 10Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit
 Sent 1967746 bytes 21306 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) 
  borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 624 undertime 0

### eth0: filtering rules

filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 u32 
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht
800 bkt 0 flowid 1:2 
  match c0a80106/ffffffff at 16

### eth1: queueing disciplines

qdisc cbq 1: rate 10Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit
 Sent 988234 bytes 11360 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) 
  borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 605 undertime 0

 
### eth1: traffic classes

class cbq 1: root rate 10Mbit (bounded,isolated) prio no-transmit
 Sent 989306 bytes 11368 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) 
  borrowed 0 overactions 0 avgidle 605 undertime 0

### eth1: filtering rules

filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 u32 
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht
800 bkt 0 flowid 1:3 
  match c0a80106/ffffffff at 12


I originally tried it on another machine that I was using bridging on 2
interfaces but bridging happens before ip filters.

Here is my ifconfig output for my firewall.

[root at firewall cbq]# ifconfig eth0
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:C0:26:63:61:10  
          inet addr:66.23.198.2  Bcast:66.23.198.3  Mask:255.255.255.252
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:20078 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:25176 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
          RX bytes:2481827 (2.3 Mb)  TX bytes:2359557 (2.2 Mb)
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0xd000 

[root at firewall cbq]# ifconfig eth1
eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:E0:C5:BC:00:5A  
          inet addr:192.168.1.254  Bcast:192.168.1.255 
Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:18957 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:15340 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:6 txqueuelen:100 
          RX bytes:1456185 (1.3 Mb)  TX bytes:1639726 (1.5 Mb)
          Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf000 

[root at firewall cbq]# 

What I like about this script is that there is a compile command.  It
outputs the commands it executes.  This give me a chance to learn the
commands.

Thanks again,
Chris


On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 16:08, Dow Hurst wrote:
> I was using the cbq script to do it on a whole interface.
> 
> Here is the link to the script.  It is pretty simple to work with and very 
> effective on an interface.  It may do what you want depending on the queues 
> that are set up.
> Dow
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/cbqinit
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Christopher Fowler wrote:
> > Maybe someone knows how to do this.  I have one machine on my network
> > that I want to modify its upload speed.  I have a 1.5/256 ADSL
> > connection.  On this one machine I would like to limit upload speeds
> > to the equivalent of a 56k modem.  I want download speeds to remain
> > normal.  I will implement the rule on my firewall.  Does anyone know how
> > to do this?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Chris
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >