[ale] (no subject) SPAM talk...
ChangingLINKS.com
groups at ChangingLINKS.com
Sat Apr 17 03:27:55 EDT 2004
1. > Moreover, the ALE - HAS A MIRROR - that has implimented a solution.
> Where is this mirror?
> -Jim P.
2. > Re: [ale] (no subject) SPAM talk... (Dow Hurst, Fri Apr 16 21:41:34
2004)
>I've missed the info on the mirror. Where is it and how can it be used?
>Dow
The mirror is *already* operational at "ike.room17.com"
proof:
http://ike.room17.com/pipermail/ale/20031017/002150.html
This issue is being re-hashed, see:
http://www.ale.org/archive/ale/ale-2004-02/msg00012.html
The server simply obfuscates the email addresses thusly:
text: groups at ChangingLINKS.com
hyper link: ale%40ale.org?Subject=%5Bale%5D%20printing%20through%
20router&In-Reply-To=200310170031.12176.groups%40ChangingLINKS.com
Can spammers figure out how to harvest the email from that? Sure.
Will they harvest it? I strongly doubt it. In short: Spammers are programmers,
have access to programmers (or buy ready made spamming software). And writing
such code would take *time* which increases cost. Aside from the virus/
cultural spammers, the ones that desire to make a profit realize that
incurring the cost to harvest obfuscated email addresses is NOT going to
bring significantly more profit than simply harvesting un-obfuscated ones.
It takes more time to harvest obfuscated email addresses, takes longer to
write the program to slog them and the result is an email address that is
more likely to produce flames than profit. Typically, spammers will shy away
from email addresses that are less profitable including but not limited
to .gov and .edu addresses. I am not saying that spam doesn't get delivered
to these addresses, rather I am pointing out the economics of the marketing
campaign. Also, for those of you that don't know, many of the spam programs
are written with filters so that the spammer can remove entire domains, .gov
and .edu addresses. This economic theory also undermines the rumor that
spammers have low wage HUMAN workers scouring the Internet for email
addresses. Unlikely. A 486DX can slog faster than a room full of humans.
Further, if the ike server doesn't go far enough in it's obfuscation - it is
clear that it would not take more than 30 minutes to configure it to
obfuscate more than it does. Obviously the programmer who wrote the mirror's
code felt the amount of obfuscation was sufficient.
Anywise it is a much better position offering up our email addresses like
this:
http://www.ale.org/archive/ale/ale-2003-04/msg00986.html
--
Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
Drew Brown
http://www.ChangingLINKS.com
More information about the Ale
mailing list