[ale] compiled system calls versus shell scripts
Geoffrey
esoteric at 3times25.net
Thu Oct 23 14:58:22 EDT 2003
Jeff Hubbs wrote:
> Excellent question. I think the answer is that the make -j parameter
> serves to limit things. Beyond a certain point, firing off too many
> things at once probably starts to hurt more than help, mostly because
> of disk I/O. By using make -j, you've got a way to tweak the
> proceedings - find a number that's more of a sweet spot.
Okay, so you can control it by changing the passed value to '-j'. You
can do the same with shell scripts via 'sleep/wait' combos. Just
playing the devil's advocate here. I guess for someone like Chris B.
who's trying to cut boot time on his dashpc, this is a viable tweeking
solution, if it works.
> I was interested in this mostly because, using SuSE 7.0, it takes a
> Pentium/60 about four and a half minutes to get to n X logon from
> power-on.
Okay, it's viable for you too. ;)
--
Until later, Geoffrey esoteric at 3times25.net
Building secure systems inspite of Microsoft
More information about the Ale
mailing list