[ale] Re: Red Hat scare tactics
Jeff Layton
jeffrey.b.layton at lmco.com
Fri Oct 17 11:23:31 EDT 2003
Michael D. Hirsch wrote:
> On Thursday 16 October 2003 11:59 am, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > On the ROCKS mailing list I remember reading that they
> > will be switching to their own build of RH ES from the
> > .src.rpm files. They talked with Redhat and RH said this
> > was fine with them.
>
> Yes, I've heard that from RH, too. What I can't figure out is what
> difference
> it makes to recompile from source. The GPL applies equally to all
> derivative
> works, whether source or binary, doesn't it? Why not just use the binary
> RPMs?
>
From what I understand ROCKS has to do this because they
have to pull the Redhat copyrighted stuff out of the code so
they can redistribute it. Make sense?
Jeff
--
Dr. Jeff Layton
Aerodynamics and CFD
Lockheed-Martin Aeronautical Company - Marietta
More information about the Ale
mailing list