[ale] renaming the group

[Matthew Magee]

Nobody was laughing because they were busy trying to find more efficient ways 
to oranize the group.

Did you expect any other reaction?

:-)

On Tuesday 11 March 2003 10:43 pm, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> I guess I should clarify that I was being funny. At least _I_ thought I
> was being funny.
>
> Well, I _tried_ to be funny.
>
> Why is no one laughing?
>
> On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 22:31, Geoffrey wrote:
> > Marvin Dickens wrote:
> > > On 11 Mar 2003 20:31:45 -0500 "James P. Kinney III"
> > >
> > > <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com> wrote the following:
> > >> It looks like we may need to rename the group as it is growing
> > >> geographically
> > >
> > > MHO is that renaming the group is a mistake. Why not have divisions
> > > or (For the lack of a better term) chapters? This way we retain the
> > > name ALE and we avoid confusion (Which would certainly happen). Plus,
> > > it lets all of the other Linux Users Groups know that we are growing.
> >
> > I say stick with the name.  After all, AT&T is still AT&T, even though
> > it no longer stands for American Telephone and Telegraph...
> >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > >
> > > Marvin Dickens _______________________________________________ Ale
> > > mailing list Ale at ale.org http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale