[CHAOS] Re: [ale] Package Management System

[Debrihmi]

I've been eyeing SuSE myself.  I'm very impressed with the 8.2 Live CD; and
now that I know that the deps are handled, I might have to break down this up
coming month and pick it up..

~
Debrihmi



On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:54:17 -0400, Geoffrey wrote
> Amid all the .deb fans, I'll go with the combination of rpm and 
> Yast2 from SuSE.  Bottom line is, you don't even know it's rpm 
> based. Whenever you want to install/remove software, you select it 
> and Yast2 handles the dependenciess automagically.  It's a no 
> brainer and it's a gui. :)
> 
> Debrihmi wrote:
> > Hello there!
> > 
> > Most everybody agrees that one of the greatest stumbling blocks to the mass
> > adoption of Linux is this Package Management System (or lack there-of)..
> > 
> > If one a Package Management System were to be adpoted across the board, what
> > would you vote for, AND WHY..  Or do you think we should "go back to the
> > drawing board?"..
> > 
> > ~
> > Debrihmi
> > --
> > Member, "Chattahoochee Area Open Source" (http://chaos706.org)
> > -=[ Ask me about Linux ]=-
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at 3times25.net
> 
> The latest, most widespread virus?  Microsoft end user agreement.
> Think about it...


~
Debrihmi
--
Member, "Chattahoochee Area Open Source" (http://chaos706.org)
Member, "Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts (ALE)" (http://ale.org)

-=[ Ask me about Linux and be Amazed ]=-

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale