[ale] [OT] Inside A U.S. Election Vote Counting Program

runman at speedfactory.net runman at speedfactory.net
Fri Jul 11 15:57:37 EDT 2003


Hell yeah !!!!!!    Well, let's not scare them off.  If I was someone who was involved in the fubar that is the Electronic Voting Program I would think twice about walking into a lion's den.  When I asked the technical manager on the scene at the polls after I voted I got the standard party line BS complete with an egotistical attitude, so I am all for some Q & A, or "Question Time" as the British Parliament calls it.

Of course - I think accountability (which is business as usual in Open Source and good programming environments) is a good thing to apply to those involved in government.

Greg

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 10:40:23AM -0400, Dow Hurst wrote:
> Yes, YES, YESSSSSSSSSSSSS!
> I would LOVE to hear that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> They can expect myself and Mike Warfield (I suspect) to probe them in
> great depth to analyze the security.  I'm sure that there would be a
> MASSIVE crowd!
> 
> Bob
> 
> > The CSIS Dept. here at KSU was responsible for overseeing the electronic
> > voting here in GA.  After all the discussion and links, a presentation
> > on electronic voting from a security and open source viewpoint might be
> > in order at a ALE-NW meeting sometime in the future.  I could make sure
> > it was publicized properly.  I am sure that a pro con unbiased approach
> > would be quite interesting to students, faculty, and ALE'rs.  I sure
> > don't trust the process or the overseers for the long run.  I know that
> > the guys here at KSU worked themselves to death trying to make sure
> > everything was in order.  I can trust them.  But, how can I trust
> > vendors or politicians to do the right thing if tempted with options
> > that are too easy and hidden as well?  Either it must be completely open
> > or it's not useful at all.  There is no way to control the process if it
> > isn't open.  There are always some people who will try to bend the
> > system to their will and you can't have overseers over overseers ad
> > infinitum....
> > Dow
> >
> >
> > Joe Steele wrote:
> >
> > >Since the issue of electronic voting security has been discussed on
> > >the ale list in the past, I forward the following link for anyone
> > >interested who has not seen it yet.
> > >
> > >http://www.blackboxvoting.com/scoop/S00065.htm
> > >
> > >--Joe
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Ale mailing list
> > >Ale at ale.org
> > >http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > __________________________________________________________
> > Dow Hurst                  Office: 770-499-3428
> > Systems Support Specialist    Fax: 770-423-6744
> > 1000 Chastain Rd. Bldg. 12
> > Chemistry Department SC428  Email:   dhurst at kennesaw.edu
> > Kennesaw State University         Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com
> > Kennesaw, GA 30144
> > *****************************************************************
> > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential  *
> > information intended for a specific individual and purpose,     *
> > and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient,*
> > you should delete this message and are hereby notified that     *
> > any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or    *
> > the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.   *
> > *****************************************************************
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale





More information about the Ale mailing list