[ale] BlueCurve cure?

[Vikram Nanda]

and over that, I find my KDE desktop a lot slower than that blue thing.




>From: "John Wells" <jb at sourceillustrated.com>
>Reply-To: ale at ale.org
>To: <ale at ale.org>
>CC: <syssfn at panther.Gsu.EDU>
>Subject: Re: [ale] BlueCurve cure?
>Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:49:04 -0500 (EST)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from mail.room17.com ([66.163.243.242]) by 
>mc10-f31.bay6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sat, 8 Feb 
>2003 20:48:41 -0800
>Received: (qmail 15496 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2003 04:54:00 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO bradley.room17.com) (127.0.0.1)  by localhost 
>with SMTP; 9 Feb 2003 04:54:00 -0000
>Received: (qmail 15473 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2003 04:53:45 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO imf46bis.bellsouth.net) (205.152.58.94)  by 
>66.163.243.242 with SMTP; 9 Feb 2003 04:53:45 -0000
>Received: from coastal.homelinux.org ([68.155.240.172])          by 
>imf46bis.bellsouth.net          (InterMail vM.5.01.04.25 
>201-253-122-122-125-20020815) with ESMTP          id 
><20030209045000.XING8598.imf46bis.bellsouth.net at coastal.homelinux.org>;     
>      Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:50:00 -0500
>Received: from sourceillustrated.com (coastal.homelinux.org [127.0.0.1])by 
>coastal.homelinux.org (Postfix) with SMTPid DE8F8143638; Sat,  8 Feb 2003 
>23:49:04 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from 172.16.2.8        (SquirrelMail authenticated user jb)       
>  by 192.168.2.4 with HTTP;        Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:49:04 -0500 (EST)
>X-Message-Info: dHZMQeBBv44lPE7o4B5bAg==
>Message-ID: <35170.172.16.2.8.1044766144.squirrel at 192.168.2.4>
>In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0302082324530.14809-100000 at panther.Gsu.EDU>
>References: <200210290357.40530.x3 at ChangingLINKS.com>        
><Pine.GSO.4.21.0302082324530.14809-100000 at panther.Gsu.EDU>
>X-Priority: 3
>Importance: Normal
>X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.10)
>Sender: ale-admin at ale.org
>Errors-To: ale-admin at ale.org
>X-BeenThere: ale at ale.org
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale>,<mailto:ale-request at ale.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Id: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale.ale.org>
>List-Post: <mailto:ale at ale.org>
>List-Help: <mailto:ale-request at ale.org?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale>,<mailto:ale-request at ale.org?subject=subscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://www.ale.org/pipermail/ale/>
>Return-Path: ale-admin at ale.org
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2003 04:48:41.0148 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[847CEFC0:01C2CFF6]
>
>Stephen F Nicholas said:
> > Drew,
> > I agree with you on Rh 7.2 .  However as much we like 7.2, its EOL is at
> > the end of this year (according to the RH press releases), and we'll be
> > forced to upgrade :-(
>
>Shouldn't, unless you rely on rhn.  Just because it's EOL'd by RH doesn't
>mean you can't continue using it and upgrade the various packages yourself
>by hand ;).
>
>John
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale