[ale] OT: Space Shuttle Columbia
Jeff Hubbs
hbbs at attbi.com
Tue Feb 4 21:12:52 EST 2003
> The bottom is smooth. Nowhere to hold on/attach to. Adding attachment
> points would result in an unacceptable amount of friction at that point
> and would likely result in the same thing we saw Saturday.
I know that the bottom is smooth. But, we all know that they've had the
MMU for YEARS and it's not very big; why is it not standard equipment?
It needs no attachment points. Barring that, what about slinging some
nylon rope. Why was there no EVA suit?
> Besides, even
> if they knew, what options did they really have?
Read on.
> Can't fix it.
Point taken, but could they not fix it because it's IMPOSSIBLE or
because they didn't have a few pounds of tools or parts?
> Can't
> re-enter any other way.
I am not satisfied of that. When you say "any other way," you mean with
a normal wheel landing at the Cape or at Edwards. I am not satisfied
that, knowing serious damage was present, that an abnormal re-entry
wasn't an option, even if it meant a mid-ocean ditch. Besides, there
are emergency runways all over the world - IIRC, Dobbins is one.
> Can't dock at the ISS. Can't just fire up Atlantis
> and send them a ride. They took their chances and lost. That's life on the
> edge. The same thing happens in military aviation, just on a much smaller
> scale. You put your fate in the hands of the Almighty and do your job as
> ordered.
I'm not sure of your point. This was not a military mission nor was it
an all-military crew.
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
More information about the Ale
mailing list