[ale] C#

Mike Millson mgm at atsga.com
Wed Sep 25 20:49:11 EDT 2002


I concur. I don't see any evidence of Java being slow or limited (on Linux
or in general). I have used Java + Tomcat 4.x to interface w/ MySQL and
Oracle databases and parse large XML feeds and have been very impressed.

I also agree w/ the earlier post: C# + linux = insanity.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Denny Chambers [mailto:dchambers at snapserver.com]
To: ale at ale.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:01 PM
Cc: ale at ale.org
Subject: Re: [ale] C#


Why not stick with Java? Running Java apps under the 1.3.x and 1.4.x
JVMs are not that bad. All of those folks complaining about how slow it
is, probably haven't used it much since the Java 1.x days. You shouldn't
have any problems handling 100+ connections. Look at projects like
Tomcat and other Web Application servers, these servers are designed to
handle hundreds, even thousands of connections. If you want your app to
be web based, I would still recomend Java. Servlet have proven to be
very fast at servering dynamic web content. Better than C in cases, and
much better than perl. Also Java gives you the portablility you need. It
will also make things like internationalization much easier.

If your going the web based route, add this site to your research:

http://www.2020media.com/support/javavscgi.htm

My $0.02,

Denny

cfowler wrote:

>Right now I'm at the beginning of a large Java project.  I'm just
>desiging forms for now.  But this is just graphics.  I'm doing research
>as to the best way to go.  I need to be scalable when it comes to
>threads and I believe that Java may bite me in the end. I want to handle
>100+ TCP connections into one client.
>
>
>On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 14:48, Geoffrey wrote:
>
>
>>cfowler wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Anyone here using C# on Linux?
>>>
>>>
>>Why would you?
>>
>>
>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---
>>>This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
>>>See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should
be
>>>sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at 3times25.net
>>
>>I didn't have to buy my radio from a specific company to listen
>>to FM, why doesn't that apply to the Internet (anymore...)?
>>
>>
>>---
>>This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
>>See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should
be
>>sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>---
>This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
>See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should
be
>sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
>
>
>



---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.



---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.






More information about the Ale mailing list