[ale] [WAY OT] Ethics Question

[F. Grant Robertson]

Quite to the contrary, my example is on point. And you, might I add, are
dodging the question.

Check, and mate.

1970 Postal Reorganization Act (as amended), 39 U.S.C. § 101 et seq

cheers,
-G

P.s. I'm a real pain in the a** to debate with :)


On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 21:02, Geoffrey wrote:
> 
> 
> F. Grant Robertson wrote:
> > And, according to US law, your mailbox belongs to the Postmaster
> > General. Again, do you want the mailman reading your mail just because
> > it's in his possession?
> 
> There is on record, mail personnel who have been convicted of crimes for 
> opening peoples mail.
> 
> I'd personally like to see the law you refer to.
> 
> Your comparison is still invalid.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at 3times25.net
> 
> I didn't have to buy my radio from a specific company to listen
> to FM, why doesn't that apply to the Internet (anymore...)?
> 
> 
> ---
> This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
> sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> 
> 
> 




---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.