[ale] sorta [OT] IO vs clock cycles
Cade Thacker
linux at cade.org
Thu Nov 7 14:36:06 EST 2002
Need a little bit of knowledge from you guys/gals. I got in a discussion
about running Java in an enterprise system, and one of the gentlemen I
repect a great deal said that Java would be much happier running on an NT
box with a very high clock cycle, then a Unix work horse from IBM. His
reasoning was that the Unix box is built(and build well) for IO intensive
tasks, DB type stuff, where NT is build to take advantage of clock speed.
Therefore the JVM would be happier on NT.
On the same topic, we always hear that the mainframe downstairs has less
horse power then our PCs, but yet the mainframe handles Millions of
transactions a second, and my PC dogs out running 5 browsers at once.
Please explain.
Where do you guys think linux would fall in this debate?
Thanks guys, and as always looking forward to your answers.
--cade
On Linux vs Windows
==================
Remember, amateurs built the Ark, Professionals built the Titanic!
==================
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list