[ale] Reply to ALE messages

[Tommie M. Jones]

It does seem inconsistent from other email list though.  Also when people
do hit reply all the originator (and other people who have responded) of
the message gets two copies (one from list and one to their personal
address).

If we want to promote sharing of information (that is by default responses
go to the group as a whole) then it seems like we would do a
reply-to-list.

---------------------------
Get inside Atlanta's Tech Scene - http://www.atlantageek.com
'Business Intelligence' is not an Oxymoron - http://www.intelliforge.com


On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Jim Popovitch wrote:

> HaHaHa!, you'll have better luck starting a flame war by just briefly saying
> that vi or emacs is better than the other.  ;-)
>
> Seriously, there are valid reasons for both reply-to-list and
> reply-to-sender.  Unfortunately neither will satisfy everyone.  I run an
> unrelated list that is a reply-to-list and quite frequently folks ask for it
> to be reply-to-sender.
>
> -Jim P.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Krumwiede [mailto:krum at smyrnacable.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:02 AM
> To: ALE List
> Subject: [ale] Reply to ALE messages
>
>
> Does it annoy anyone else that when you reply to a message from the list, it
> goes to an individual instead of back to the list?
>
>
> ---
> This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
> sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
>
>
> ---
> This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
> sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
>
>


---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.