[ale] Recommended Support Levels
jeff hubbs
hbbs at mediaone.net
Fri Feb 1 09:28:39 EST 2002
This is something I've given a good deal of thought to and I've pretty
much concluded that you can dial in how much admin overhead you want to
endure, given a certain set of business needs, based on how you design
your setup.
If you want to live in hell, order a Dell box for everybody, use the
Windows install that they come with, and have them all preloaded with
Office. Oh, and then network them peer-to-peer. Oh, and give at least
a quarter of them laptops. Ha, you'll be slitting your wrists!
The last time I set an NT environment, I had it set up so that as many
of the apps as possible ran from the file server. The contents of the
Start menus on each machine, the desktop settings, and the desktop icons
were all controlled from one place. Because people were logging in on
their own NT domain accounts instead of as Administrator with no
password (as I have seen countless people do, and it's nuts) there
wasn't much damage that a virus could do to the system itself and since
the machines ran the Lotus Notes client instead of MS Outlook, the
chances for virus infection spreading were lower right there.
IMHO, for many work situations, people don't need to run any more apps
than you want them to run, so there's no point letting them be able to
install them; they'll only cause trouble, right!
And, IMNSHO, it's *insane* to give most office maggo^H^H^H^H^Husers
1.4GHz desktops with 60GB drives (you KNOW it's happening!!). But, you
can't BUY a new drive of less than 20GB anymore. This is a sign to me
that desktop machines, as they are generally marketed and sold today,
have no place in common networked business settings.
What I would love to do is to put together an environment where desktop
PCs were pretty much turned into X terminals but the users didn't know
it or care. A small group of "app servers" would do the heavy lifting -
THAT's where the dual 4GB Xeons with the RAID arrays would go. The
desktops would go driveless (poof, never replace a desktop's drive
again!) and boot over the network from a file server.
One thing that this does is that the users can still run their P/120s
from seven years ago and feel like they're just screamin'. You wind up
marginalizing desktop hardware; it's still *important,* but you don't
have to CARE about it anywhere near as much.
Now, this does mean that you still have to be able to afford some
serious hardware, but you don't need to have anywhere near as MUCH of
it. You just have to be able to build a box that can run a hundred
instances of StarOffice (might not want to run SETI at Home on those
boxes)! If you're really sportin' you might want to create MOSIX
clusters or similar to serve out your primary user apps. Then, if you
were watching the loads and things started to look a little tight, you
could just put some more hamsters on the wheel.
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list