[ale] ntsecurity.nu - questions Linux backdoors

[Steve Long]

Check the archives.  At least these people are convinced (88%) that M$ has
put backdoors in.

I'm curious about the 8% who said there were none in M$ O/S's and the 3% who
weren't sure!



We need to do a lot more education on what open source means!


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Andrew Knapka" <jknapka at earthlink.net>
To: ale at ale.org
To: "Wandered Inn" <esoteric at denali.atlnet.com>
Cc: "ALE" <ale at ale.org>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: [ale] ntsecurity.nu - questions Linux backdoors


> Wandered Inn wrote:
> >
> > A M$ shill site that asks if you think there are intentional backdoors
> > in Linux.
> > Get the word out and vote. :)
> >
> > > http://www.ntsecurity.nu
>
> Hmm. So 62% of Windog drones who have no clue believe
> (without having bothered to check, which they actually
> could with Linux, unlike Windog) that there are
> intentional backdoors in Linux. Is this meaningful
> or what?
>
> (I voted "No", BTW :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> # Joe Knapka
> # "You know how many remote castles there are along the
> #  gorges? You can't MOVE for remote castles!" - Lu Tze re. Uberwald
> # Linux MM docs:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~jknapka/linux-mm/vmoutline.html
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message
body.

--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.