[ale] network problems

[Mazukna, Thomas]

what ifconfig and ipchains -L -n for each box says?

Tomas

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Nagorski [mailto:kenn at pcintelligent.com]
To: ale at ale.org
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:04 PM
To: ale at ale.org
Subject: [ale] network problems


Hi there,

	OK. I have two redhat servers. we will call them one and two.on
box one you can ping box two on box two you can't see box one... I can't
figure it out. It's plugged into a Flowpoint 2200 router/DSL but we
removed it from there and plugged just the two computers into a hub. We
had the same problem

	It can't see anything wrong from the routing tables. A hub is not
capable of dropping ICMP packets... I am not sure what is up? Below are
the routing tables. Maybe someone can suggest somehting for me to take a
look at. 

box one --------------------------------------------
[root at ns /root]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
64.81.221.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.224 U     0      0        0
eth0
127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 lo
0.0.0.0         64.81.221.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
eth0
box two -------------------------------------------
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
Iface
64.81.221.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.224 U     0      0        0
eth0
127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 lo
0.0.0.0         64.81.221.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0
eth0
-------------------------------------------------

Thanks
Ken

-- 
IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s)
named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged
or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense 
of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not 
authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating 
social faux pas. 

Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context
somewhere
other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no grammatical use

and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this
email, 
although the kelpie next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. 
Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to 
learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning
 backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft. 

However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your 
computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you 
have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, 
whisk and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes. 

--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message
body.
--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.