[ale] Compiling kernel-2.4.0 on Redhat
Scott Nolde
smnoldelinux at mediaone.net
Mon Jan 8 16:41:34 EST 2001
Fulton Green wrote:
>
> Oh boy, here we go again ...
Well, I hope not.
>
> I don't think gcc-c++ is involved in kernel complilation, being that there
> is no C++ code in the kernel.
>
> I am running 2.4.0-test13-pre4 compiled using gcc-2.96-54. No worries AFAIK.
> Plenty of warning stmts when you build though. The latest Raw Hide release
> has updated gcc (and related) RPMs.
>
> To recap all the other things said in previous discussions: if you're
> releasing binaries for general public downloading, it's best to stick w/a
> pre-2.96 version of gcc until gcc-3.0 hits.
>
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:14:59PM -0500, Scott Nolde wrote:
> > I'm curious, has anyone been able to compile the released version of
> > linux-2.4.0 with RedHat's gcc-1.1.2-40+, gcc-c++-2.96-54, and
> > gcc-2.96-54?
> >
> > I have been able to compile knernel-2.4.0 with kgcc-1.1.2-40 only after
> > changing the Makefile (one line only).
> >
> > I'm sure the gcc/kgcc discussion has been ground into the dirt based on
> > decisions at RedHat, but what is the status of gcc after RedHat released
> > kgcc? Is there a gcc release planned which includes changes by RedHat?
I'll doublecheck my configuration and recompile using only gcc this
time.
Thanks,
Scott
--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.
More information about the Ale
mailing list