[ale] Microsoft want to know it...

[Wandered Inn]

"J. Reeves Hall" wrote:

> 
> Perhaps I'll conduct a bit of testing on my own... Set up Linux and
> Windows NT on my machine, then hammer them from across the network and
> see which works better...
> Ooh, but then they could sue me for publishing my results... Sheesh :)

I've got a dual boot of Linux/NT, and Linux certainly out performs NT on
this box.  What they've not discussed is the difference in stability.  I
can't tell you how many times NT has crashed on this box, I quit
counting.  I can't tell you how many times Linux has, because it hasn't,
ever.  And I use this box more for Linux then NT.

> 
> -Reeves
> 
> --
> In a world without fences, why do we need Gates?
> Linux. Because I have better things to do than worry about Y2K.
> 1:01am up 4 days, 18:27, 7 users, load average: 1.02, 0.42, 0.16

--
Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at denali.atlnet.com

It should be illegal to yell "Y2K" in a crowded economy.
	-- Larry Wall, creator of the programming language Perl